****

Fate of Articles

 

2011

2012

2013

Published manuscripts

83

56

35

Still under review

2

6

25

Returned to author for correction

-

-

7

Rejected by reviewers (poor standards, n/a to AJFAND topics)

14

16

17

Deleted (nonconformity to AJFAND standards)

82

70

25

Deleted after review (authors failed to resubmit after corrections)

36

38

8

Withdrawn by author

35

16

9

Total number of manuscripts submitted

252

202

126

 

FATE OF ARTICLES SUBMITTED IN 2013
In the year 2013, we received a total of 126 manuscripts. They were subjected to the AJFAND guidelines and their details are as follows:
• 35 papers completed the peer review process successfully and have been published
•25 papers are still in the review process(peer review and technical review)
• 7 papers did not conform to AJFAND standards and have been returned to authors to correct and bring copies that conform to our guidelines
• 17 papers went through peer review process and were rejected by reviewers due to various reasons (some were not appropriate to AJFAND, others language was bad and so on)
• 25 papers did not conform to AJFAND standards and authors were asked to correct and resubmit. But they failed to do so and were deleted.
• 8 papers went through peer review process and authors were unable to work on the comments and resubmit. The papers were deleted
• 9 papers were submitted and withdrawn by authors (some of the authors were impatient and would not wait for the review process to be completed).

 

FATE OF ARTICLES SUBMITTED IN 2012
In the year 2012, we received a total of 202 manuscripts. They were subjected to the AJFAND guidelines and their details are as follows:
• 56 papers completed the peer review process successfully and have been published
• 6 papers are still in the review process(peer review and technical review)
• 16 papers went through peer review process and were rejected by reviewers due to various reasons (some were not appropriate to AJFAND, others language was bad and so on)
• 70 papers did not conform to AJFAND standards and authors were asked to correct and resubmit. But they failed to do so and were deleted.
• 38 papers went through peer review process and authors were unable to work on the comments and resubmit. The papers were deleted
• 16 papers were submitted and withdrawn by authors (some of the authors were impatient and would not wait for the review process to be completed).

 

FATE OF ARTICLES SUBMITTED IN 2011
In the year 2011, we received a total of 252 manuscripts. They were subjected to the AJFAND guidelines and their details are as follows:
• 83 papers went review process successfully and have been published
• 2 papers are still in the review process(peer review and technical review)
• 14 papers went through peer review process and were rejected by reviewers due to various reason (some were not appropriate to AJFAND, others language was bad extra)
•82 papers did not conform to AJFAND standards and authors were asked to correct and resubmit. But they failed to do so they were deleted.
• 36 papers went through peer review process and authors were unable to work on the comments and resubmit. The papers were deleted
• 35 papers were submitted and withdrawn by authors (some of the authors were impatient and would not wait for the review process to be concluded).